QFD | The Parable of the Crumbling Bridge
- Herbert Berkley
- 2 days ago
- 4 min read

The Parable of the Crumbling Bridge
A reflection on truth ignored
There was a kingdom divided by a wide river. To keep the people united, the king commissioned a bridge—not the grandest in the world, nor the most decorated, but built by master craftsmen who followed the king's own design. The stones were cut to his specifications. The foundations were laid according to his word.
For generations, the bridge held. Floods came. Earthquakes shook the land. Storms battered the railings. The bridge stood.
Then a new generation arose.
They looked at the bridges of other kingdoms—some made of wood, some of painted rope, some held together by little more than optimism. They thought those bridges looked more interesting. More personal. The old stone bridge seemed too plain. Too narrow. Too unyielding.
A group of thinkers gathered in the city square. "Why should we follow the king's old design?" they asked. "Why should one blueprint govern all of us? Let everyone build according to the truth within themselves."
The people liked this. It felt like freedom.
So the rules changed.
One merchant carved out stones to make room for his stall. A painter covered the warning signs because they seemed unwelcoming. An engineer widened one side but weakened the other. A poet replaced stones with wood because it was "more expressive."
Each had reasons. Each felt justified.
Those who warned about the foundations were dismissed. You're rigid. You're stuck in the past. Your truth isn't everyone's truth.
For a while, everything seemed fine. The sun still shone. People still crossed. The bridge looked more colorful than ever.
But beneath the surface, the stones no longer aligned. Weight shifted unevenly. Cracks spread where no one thought to look.
Then the spring rains came heavier than usual. The river pressed against the weakened pillars. One ordinary morning, without ceremony, the bridge gave way.
Hundreds fell. The kingdom was divided. Trade collapsed. Families were separated by water they could no longer cross.
The people cried out: How did this happen?
And those who remembered the king's design answered: The bridge did not fail you. You abandoned what made it stand.
This parable is not really about bridges.
It's about what happens when a people decide that truth is whatever they want it to be. When everyone becomes their own architect, no shared structure can hold. The bridge doesn't care about your sincerity. It only stands when built on what is actually true.
Scripture saw this coming. The writer of Judges described an era when "everyone did what was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25). It did not end well. The book closes in civil war, mass abduction, and a tribe nearly erased from Israel. That's where "my truth" leads when it has no king.
Solomon warned: "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way to death" (Proverbs 14:12). The path feels reasonable. The modifications seem harmless. But the destination is fixed, whether we believe in it or not.
Jesus told a similar story. A man built his house on sand because it was easier, faster, more convenient than digging down to rock. "And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of it" (Matthew 7:27). The house didn't collapse because the builder was insincere. It collapsed because sand is sand.
Paul named the exchange at the heart of every crumbling bridge: "They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator" (Romans 1:25). This is the blueprint of all cultural decay. We don't reject truth because we've found something better. We reject it because we want to be our own king.
Isaiah saw where it ends: "Justice is turned back, and righteousness stands far away; for truth has stumbled in the public squares, and uprightness cannot enter" (Isaiah 59:14). When truth stumbles, everything stumbles with it. But here is what the parable doesn't say—and what the gospel does.
The bridge can be rebuilt.
Not by returning to "ancient wisdom" as though tradition itself saves. Not by moral effort or cultural reform. The bridge holds only when it's built on the Cornerstone the builders rejected.
Jesus didn't just teach the truth. He said, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life" (John 14:6). Truth isn't a concept to be debated. It's a Person to be trusted. Every other foundation is sand dressed up as stone.
Paul called Christ "the cornerstone, in whom the whole structure, being joined together, grows into a holy temple in the Lord" (Ephesians 2:20–21). The church isn't held together by shared opinions or cultural consensus. It's held together by Him.
So the question isn't whether you're sincere in your modifications.
The question is whether you're building on the Rock.
Where have you carved your own convenience into the design? Where have you painted over warnings because they felt too restrictive? Where have you treated your preferences as though they were blueprints?
The waters of untruth are rising. The floods are coming.
But there is still time to build on what actually holds.
"Everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them will be like a wise man who built his house on the rock. And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house, but it did not fall, because it had been founded on the rock."—Matthew 7:24–25 (ESV)



